loss.avif’There’s no plan B’: Why Port Adelaide’s greatest tactical strength may also be its greatest weakness

Port Adelaide has been a curious case for a number of years now under Ken Hinkley.

Consistently making finals, consistently challenging top-end teams, multiple top 4 finishes and a couple of prelim finals to go along with that. But Hinkley and Port can’t seem to clear that final hurdle.

The criticism levelled at Port has been that they are a flat-track bully; they beat up on those teams that aren’t challenging but they can’t seem to get over the top teams outside of the odd win at home.

Is it personnel?

Is it game plan?

Is it motivation?

Well, unfortunately, it’s a combination of everything, but there’s one area that doesn’t get the blowtorch to the same extent.

We know Port have had defensive issues in the past; prior to this year, Aliir Aliir was the only defender with the height to genuinely be considered a viable like-for-like match-up.

Queue the pursuit of Brandon Zerk-Thatcher and Esava Ratugolea; both of whom have been good inclusions without being standouts.

The ruck position was also in question last year with Scott Lycett practically limping into retirement at the end of 2023.

Port brought in Former tiger Ivan Soldo and ex-Bulldog Jordon Sweet to bolster the ranks and provide some much-needed stability to the position.

While Soldo began the year strongly, injuries have interrupted his year, and the lack of continuity has exposed his form to the point where he was dropped for their round 15 drubbing to Brisbane.

So, it’s fair to say that even with the four recruits, the ruck and defence still look vulnerable.

But now Port has an issue with the forward line, that has served them so well, being incredibly ineffective.

Charlie Dixon, Like Lycett last year, is limping towards retirement. I can’t recall too many games this year where his influence has been felt.

Jeremy Finlayson is out of form and seems at this point to be a plug-and-play type of player that can fill a hole if it is desperately needed.

Todd Marshall isn’t living up to his new contract and is failing to show he can take the reins, and Mitch Georgiadis is coming off an ACL so we won’t see his best until next year I would imagine.

The forwards haven’t been helped by the ball movement. Port Adelaide is terribly predictable going forward, very straight line and is easy for opposition defenders to read.

That being said, Port’s forward press isn’t particularly effective either meaning teams have been able to have great success transitioning from their back half.

But none of this is particularly new information. The major concern for me coming off the back of their 79-point loss to Brisbane two weeks ago is their midfield.

On paper you love it; a young core of Zak Butters, Connor Rozee, and Jason Horne-Francis, all capable of being Brownlow medal players.

Mix in Wines, a former Brownlow medallist, and Travis Boak, a player that would be in the same category as Scott Pendlebury and Joel Selwood had he played in Victoria.

Add a touch of Willem Drew and Dan Houston – and it looks formidable.

So, what’s the issue? Well, the issue is this midfield continues to falter against quality opposition.

Against GWS, Port were -19 in contested possession, and against Brisbane, it was a whopping -40 in contested possession, as well as -15 in clearances. Earlier this year Port was nowhere after quarter time against Collingwood and ended the game -41 in contested possession.

This isn’t the first time Port have been soundly beaten in the midfield. In both of their Final losses last year Port were bullied around the ball by the same opposition in Brisbane and GWS.

In the 2023 qualifying final Brisbane won the game on the outside registering 20 more uncontested possessions and 16 more inside 50s as they dominated territory. While in the Semi Final GWS won clearance by 16 and contested possession by 19.

Going back to the infamous 2021 preliminary final at home to the Western Bulldogs, the Power was out of that game by quarter time kicking one goal to seven. The Dogs also won contested possession by 30, won clearances by six and had 12 more inside 50s.

Even in a winning performance earlier this year against Fremantle the Port midfield struggled losing clearances by nine.

We have seen samples from over a number of years now that Port can’t seem to handle the biggest moments consistently enough to realistically challenge for a flag.

The biggest concern from their midfield appears to be attitudinal. We just don’t see enough of the hard defensive running efforts from the mainstays and when the game is going against them, they try to fight fire with fire.

Port Adelaide is a run-and-gun team with only one method: speed. But when the opposition has momentum in these games Port don’t have a plan B which often results in other teams putting a run of goals on the board.

Rather than trying to win momentum back through offence, Port needs to have the ability to slow the game down and halt the opposition’s progress so they can stem the bleeding.

The Power conceded 13 goals to just three in the second and third quarter against Brisbane on the weekend, with a seven-goal to two second quarter.

Essentially ending any hope Port had, but because Port don’t have that second switch, they are unable to arrest momentum in the game.

Sometimes the flow of the game calls for a team to revert to more of a kick mark game, and with great ball users in Houston and Kane Farrell, Port should be able to kick their way out of defence when they want to slow the game or when their run game deserts them.

Unfortunately, the talls don’t offer any offensive rebound.

None of Allir, Ratugolea, or Zerk-Thatcher are particularly good users of the ball so quite often when they are able to get those intercept possessions, their initial thought is to kick backwards or sideways to get it to a better user.

All those kicks serve to do, however, is to give the opposition more time to set up behind the ball and it invites pressure.

Port Adelaide’s issues are far greater than just defence and ruck as we’ve been told over the past few years.

From a coaching angle, the team doesn’t seem to have a plan outside of a fast straight-line attack, which we are seeing is easier for the opposition to defend, and doesn’t particularly stand up when the opposition has momentum.

The midfield has an extremely attacking mindset as well, so if they don’t win the initial contest, they get burnt the other way.

Midfield coach Josh Carr is the likely replacement for Ken Hinkley so I wouldn’t count on that style changing.

Defensively, if you can make it through that initial wave of Port pressure, they become incredibly easy to score against.

They press super aggressively and expose their backline and those defenders can’t seem to defend as a unit.

Personnel-wise though, how good do we really think this list is? Sure, the midfield is littered with stars, but the rest of the team just seems like a lot of B to B+ level players.

Is Marshall a player you can build around or is he a complimentary piece to a stronger forward?

Willie Rioli has flashes but is nowhere near consistent enough to be a genuine A-grader.

The 3 talls down back are all solid and capable, but I can’t help but feel none of them are at that elite level.

Chairman David Koch has approached every year with a win-now attitude, and while that’s admirable, I can’t help but wonder about Port’s road ahead.

A new coach is a certainty at the end of this year or next, But Port don’t have a lot to work with in this year’s draft, nor did they last year.

The list is by no means old, in fact, overall age shouldn’t be too big a concern.

But if this list is run of the mill, capable of beating those below but not challenging those above, then Port will face an uphill task renovating this list without either sliding down the ladder – or potentially moving on a star player

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *