The Green Bay Packers are going through their third OTAs under head coach Matt LaFleur–but Aaron Rodgers is nowhere to be found.

Rodgers remains away from the action as the standoff between the organization and its star quarterback continues. Rodgers may want out of Green Bay, but right now, the team is not budging on trading him.

After today’s practice session, LaFleur addressed reporters about a number of topics. Obviously, Rodgers was discussed, including what the third-year head coach told his players about the absent MVP.

LaFleur’s message: “Control what you can control,” according to ESPN’s Dianna Russini.

This is undoubtedly an awkward spot for LaFleur, who candidly said last weekend that the Packers “want [Rodgers] back in the worst way.” Obviously, he’s hoping Rodgers returns at some point, but in the meantime, he has no choice but to go about his business with the players that are in attendance.

One of those players is second-year quarterback Jordan Love, who LaFleur said has shown improvement from last year early on in OTAs. If the season started today, Love would likely be the Packers’ starter, with veteran Blake Bortles serving as the backup.

If that is Green Bay’s QB reality come September, it might be a long season at Lambeau.

The post Matt LaFleur Reveals His Message To Team About Aaron Rodgers appeared first on The Spun.

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The jury in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL is expected to begin deliberations on Wednesday after both sides wrapped up their cases on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez will have a conference with attorneys for both sides Tuesday morning to determine final jury instructions. Gutierrez could also hear a motion from the NFL on Tuesday afternoon to grant judgment as a matter of law to the league because the plaintiffs did not provide enough evidence.

Gutierrez will then give final instructions to the jury of five men and three women Wednesday morning before final arguments begin. Each side will get 1 hour, 10 minutes to make their statements with the plaintiffs getting an additional 20 minutes for rebuttal.

The NFL’s final witness was Stanford economics professor B. Douglas Bernheim, whose testimony began last Thursday and wrapped up Monday morning.

Bernheim reiterated the league’s position that selling out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on Fox and CBS to DirecTV from 1994 to 2022 and now Google YouTube TV benefits the fan and creates level competition on the playing field.

Harvard professor Einer Elhauge, a rebuttal witness for the plaintiffs, contended there were no links between the restraints the league put in to make “Sunday Ticket” a premium package and creating competitive balance.

Elhauge also testified that the approximately $62.5 million each team gets per year from “Sunday Ticket” would not cause massive ramifications to the league’s salary cap or a team’s operating budget.

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones testified last week that if he was able to sell his out-of-market rights, he would not be in favor of a salary cap.

The class action, which covers 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons, claims the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games aired on CBS and Fox at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering “Sunday Ticket” only on a satellite provider.

The NFL maintains it has the right to sell “Sunday Ticket” under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs say that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.

If the NFL is found liable, a jury could award $7 billion in damages, but that number could balloon to $21 billion because antitrust cases can triple damages.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco, but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.

Whatever the decision ends up being, the losing side is expected to appeal to the 9th Circuit and then possibly the Supreme Court.